Ethics, patient interest should guide physician, industry interactions
By Jeanne L. DelSignore, MD, Chair, AAOS Ethics Committee and Richard N. Peterson, JD, AAOS General Counsel
This is the second in a series of articles examining the relationship between healthcare companies and healthcare professionals. Yesterday, we reviewed the AAOS Opinion on Ethics and Professionalism and the proposed Orthopaedist-Industry Standards of Professionalism (SOPs); today we examine the Advanced Medical Technology Association (AdvaMed) Code of Ethics on Interactions with Health Care Professionals, which went into effect in January 2004.
For more information about AdvaMed and the AdvaMed Code, visit the AdvaMed educational display, located in lobby C of the San Diego Convention Center.
AdvaMed represents more than 1,100 innovators and manufacturers of medical devices, diagnostic products and medical information systems. Its voluntary Code of Ethics on Interactions with Health Care Professionals can be found in its entirety on the AdvaMed Web site and at the AdvaMed educational display.
Upon release of the Code, AdvaMed president Pamela G. Bailey stated, “We are keeping pace with the most current thinking on manufacturers’ interactions with healthcare professionals who help develop and use lifesaving, life-improving medical innovations. This voluntary Code provides companies with information to facilitate ethical interactions with their partners in the healthcare community.”
In 2006, the AdvaMed Board voted to further encourage industry adoption of the Code by introducing an “AdvaMed Code logo.” Only device manufacturers that adopt compliance policies consistent with the Code and maintain a robust compliance infrastructure can use the logo.
Although compliance is voluntary, a 2005 survey of AdvaMed members found that more than half of the responding companies with ethical policies modified those policies to comply with the Code’s stricter requirements. About a quarter of responding companies had no prior ethical policy, but established one after the Code was introduced. Three out of four companies conduct regular training for employees, including sales representatives, marketing personnel, senior executives and general managers.
The AdvaMed Code discusses the following interactions between companies and healthcare professionals (including physicians) that advance medical science and/or improved patient care:
Advancement of medical technology. Developing cutting edge medical technology and improving existing products are collaborative processes between healthcare companies and healthcare professionals.
Safe and effective use of medical technology. The safe and effective use of sophisticated electronic, in vitro diagnostic, surgical or other medical technology often requires manufacturers to offer healthcare professionals appropriate instruction, education, training, service and technical support. Regulators may also require this type of training as a condition for product approval.
Research and education. Industry support of bona fide medical research, education and enhancement of professional skills serves patient safety and increases access to new technology.
The AdvaMed Code also recognizes that there may be interactions between healthcare companies and healthcare professionals that are not specifically discussed in the Code. The Code highlights that all interactions between industry and healthcare professionals should follow “ethical business practices and socially responsible industry conduct and shall not use any unlawful inducement in order to sell, lease, recommend, or arrange for the sale, lease or prescription of…products.”
Support for Education
The AdvaMed Code distinguishes between company-provided product training and education and company support of third-party continuing medical education (CME) conferences, such as those sponsored by the AAOS and other professional societies. For AdvaMed member-sponsored education, companies may pay for reasonable travel and modest lodging costs incurred by the attending healthcare professional as well as modest meals and receptions in connection with these programs. The Code says that payment for the meals, hospitality, travel or other expenses of the healthcare professional’s guests or for any other person who does not have a bona fide professional interest in the information being shared at the meeting is inappropriate.
The Code provides that AdvaMed members may support third-party CME conferences in the following ways:
The Code specifically addresses gifts to healthcare professionals, permitting such “gifts only if the gifts benefit patients or serve a genuine education function. Other than the gift of medical textbooks or anatomical models used for educational purposes, any gift from a[n AdvaMed] member should have a fair market value of less than $100.”
The AdvaMed Code also discusses appropriate interactions between healthcare companies and healthcare professionals in sales and promotional meetings and regarding education about appropriate reimbursement for new medical technologies.
Similar to the AAOS Opinion on Ethics and Professionalism on the Orthopaedic Surgeon’s Relationship with Industry and the proposed AAOS Orthopaedist-Industry SOPs, the AdvaMed Code also addresses the appropriate consulting arrangement between healthcare professionals and healthcare companies. In the section that follows, “Member” denotes an AdvaMed member company. The AdvaMed Code section on “Arrangements with Consultants” reads as follows:
“Many Health Care Professionals serve as consultants to Members, providing valuable bona fide consulting services, including research, participation on advisory boards, presentations at Member-sponsored training, and product collaboration. It is appropriate to pay Health Care Professionals reasonable compensation for performing these tasks. The following factors support the existence of a bona fide consulting agreement between Members and Health Care Professionals:
There is increasing interest in the interactions between health care companies and health care professionals, including physicians, as evidenced by recent articles in the media and the proliferation of voluntary codes governing these relationships. The AAOS Opinion on Ethics and Professionalism, the proposed AAOS Orthopaedist-Industry SOPs and the AdvaMed Code acknowledge that the relationship between health care companies and health care professionals is critically important and may have significant educational value and improve patient care.
We strongly encourage orthopaedic surgeons, healthcare company representatives and others involved in medical education to read and understand the AAOS Opinion on Ethics and Professionalism, the proposed Orthopaedist-Industry SOPs, and the AdvaMed Code involving the complex and potentially challenging and rewarding relationships between healthcare companies and healthcare professionals.
American Medical Association: www.ama-assn.org/ethicalgifts
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers Association (PhRMA) Code on Interactions with Healthcare Professionals: www.phrma.org/code
U.S Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Inspector General Compliance Program Guidance for Pharmaceutical Manufacturers – 68 Fed. Reg. 23731 (May 5, 2003): www.oig.hhs.gov/Pharmac.pdf
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Guidance for Industry, Industry-supported scientific and educational activities: http://www.fda.gov/guidance.pdf